Mikhail Botvinnik - The Positional Bulldozer
Mikhail Botvinnik (August 17, 1911 - May 5, 1995) of the USSR was the 6th World Champion and dominated chess for 25 - 30 years. His relentless positional pressure led one rival to compare him to a bulldozer. He was possibly the 20th Century's most important figure in the development of chess on and off the board.
Botvinnik was the first major player to come out of the newly formed Soviet Union towards the end of the 1920s. He headed a long line of incredible talent and he played a major role in building a conveyor belt of top class Soviet players.
From 1927 right through to 2000, Russia/USSR would dominate the chess world with only brief interruptions. Botvinnik's legacy is his role in the organization of Soviet chess. He played his part in his country's stranglehold, lifting the World Championship in 1948 ahead of former champion Max Euwe
A young Mikhail Botvinnik
Botvinnik was born in Leningrad, now St Petersburg in 1911 to Jewish parents. He learned to play chess at the age of 12 from a friend of his brother. His brother's friend introduced Mikhail to basic strategic ideas. Before long Botvinnik was beating him easily.
He fell in love with the game and quickly became most formidable, winning school tournaments. The World Champion Capablanca came to Leningrad to play an exhibition simul. Botvinnik, barely 13, got a place on one of the boards and won his game with the mighty Cuban
. He had been playing chess for only a year.
After that he was a regular on the Leningrad team. At the age of 16 he became the youngest player ever to make the final stage of the USSR Championship
, becoming a National Master in the process. He won the Leningrad Masters
in 1930 and finally in 1931 captured the USSR Championship
at the age of 20.
Mikhail Botvinnik dominated Soviet chess in the 1930s
With his first of six USSR titles under his belt, Mikhail Botvinnik began to tighten a vice-like grip on Soviet chess. On his first victory he was heard to say that it was a relatively weak field with many pre-Revolution masters absent.
As the decade wore on he added to his tally of championships and major city titles around the Soviet Union. The work of the USSR chess officials began to take shape and many strong Soviet players were beginning to emerge.
Botvinnik now had designs on Alekhine's World title but he was not alone. Max Euwe
and Salo Flohr were also eyeing up the big prize. Botvinnik would have to play matches against high caliber international opponents to strengthen his claim for a title shot. He also began to play tournaments outside the Soviet Union.
Botvinnik played Salo Flohr in 1933
Salo Flohr with Mikhail Botvinnik
over 12 games, the first 6 in Moscow and the last 6 in Leningrad. Botvinnik fell behind in Moscow against the more experienced Flohr but did enough in Leningrad to secure a draw.Hastings, England 34/35
was the scene for his first competition in the West. He was now 24 years old and reaching a high level of performance. He arrived in Hastings just hours before the tournament started.
He finished a disappointing joint 5th. Emanuel Lasker
, by now a wise old man of 67, suggested that the late arrival was the cause for the poor result. Lasker said that he would have been better coming 10 days before the start of the competition to acclimatize.
Botvinnik learned this lesson well and did not repeat it. He was on the international circuit now and his results soon improved. Joint 1st at Moscow 1935 with Flohr
, 2nd behind Capablanca at Moscow 1936
, joint 1st with Capablanca in Nottingham
and 3rd behind Keres and Fine at the AVRO in Holland
Mikhail Botvinnik challenged Alexander Alekhine
Several players were queuing up to challenge Alekhine. Euwe had already briefly taken the World Championship from him but Alekhine had regained it in a rematch.
By 1938 Botvinnik, Euwe, Flohr, Fine and Keres were trying to get a title decider with Alekhine. Capablanca
had not yet given up either. Even though he was now barely on speaking terms with Alekhine, he was also still trying to secure another chance to win back the World Championship.
Alekhine had been castigated by the Soviet authorities. Botvinnik believed that he was eager to get back in favor with the USSR leaders. He also believed that Alekhine was prepared to deal with whoever could raise the highest stakes for the match.
Botvinnik tried in vain to organize a match against Alekhine
The match against Alekhine was just about set to go ahead. The Soviet authorities had finalized all of the arrangements early in 1939. There was a short delay, about two months, instigated according to Botvinnik, by some Soviet players who objected to Alekhine's return to Russia.
The World Championship Match was set to go ahead but the outbreak of World War II put the whole thing on hold indefinitely. The war would last for six years and international chess went into hibernation in Europe during this period.
Botvinnik played a handful of tournaments inside the USSR during the war years. After the war he again attempted to organize a match against Alekhine. The match was organized for 1946 in England as Alekhine's alleged Nazi links meant he wasn't welcome in the USSR. Alekhine died shortly before the match could take place. The World Championship would have to be decided between the world's top five players on a league basis.
In the meantime Botvinnik was 1st at the 1941 Absolute Championship of the USSR
, 1st at Sverdlovsk 1943
, 1st at the 1944 USSR Championship
and 1st at the 1945 USSR Championship
1948 World Championship League - Left to Right: Euwe, Smyslov, Keres, Botvinnik, Reshevsky
Those five players were Mikhail Botvinnik himself of course, Max Euwe, Vasily Smyslov, Paul Keres and Samuel Reshevsky. The World Championship was decided on a league basis with each man playing five games against each of his four rivals.
At the end of it all, Botvinnik finished in top spot (14/20)
, followed by Smyslov (11/20), then Keres and Reshevsky both (10.5/20) and finally the ex-Champion Euwe (4/20).
There were suggestions that Soviet officials leaned on Keres somewhat. Some would say that he may have been advised
that Botvinnik should not be blocked in his attempt to be World Champion.
Apparently Botvinnik himself heard of such conversations and objected vigorously. Paul Keres lost four of his five games against Botvinnik. How much influence the advice
had is impossible to say.
Bronstein, Smyslov and Tal
Mikhail Botvinnik would remain champion for most of the next 15 years. There were a couple of short interruptions along the way. David Bronstein was first to challenge in 1951
. Botvinnik clung on to the title, scraping a draw having trailed near the end.Vasily Smyslov came just as close in 1954
with Botvinnik again escaping with a draw. Three years later in another World Championship match, Smyslov won, taking the crown
. But just a year later Botvinnik reversed the result winning back his title
.Mikhail Tal from Riga was next to challenge in 1960
. He won convincingly over Botvinnik with his tactical puzzles throwing a spanner into Botvinnik's positional works.
But Botvinnik again activated his rematch clause and trained hard for it. Tal wasn't in the best of health and this may have affected his performance in the rematch. Either ways Botvinnik prevailed with daylight to spare
winning back the World Championship once again.
Mikhail Botvinnik lost his title for the final time against Tigran Petrosian
Tigran Petrosian emerged as Botvinnik's challenger in 1963. Petrosian is still regarded as possibly the hardest player ever to beat. Defensively he was so solid that when he was in form, the fortress around his King couldn't be breached.
Petrosian was the kind of guy who didn't score the full point against top class players as often as many chess enthusiasts might have liked. But his lack of adventure meant that he rarely lost.
Going into the match Botvinnik knew that any mistake would be severely punished. Petrosian would play really solid and wait for any error to pounce on.
Botvinnik's class brought him a couple of wins but overall he had to take the initiative and force the issue in the games. He took more of the risks and eventually Petrosian won 5-2 (15 draws)
Karpov, Kasparov and Kramnik
FIDE ended the policy of granting the deposed champion an automatic rematch. Botvinnik would have to compete in the Candidate's Tournament to earn the right to face Petrosian again. He refused to play as just another candidate and never competed for the World Championship again.
He continued to compete in major tournaments up until 1970 showing his old magic in flashes now and again. He was no longer able to win the biggest tournaments but he could still win a game against anyone.
He founded a chess school in 1963 and many great players from what was the USSR graduated from it. Anatoly Karpov
, Garry Kasparov
and Vladimir Kramnik eventually became World Champions.
Other high level players included Alexei Shirov, Vladimir Akopian and Jaan Ehlvest. Mikhail Botvinnik continued to work until shortly before his death in May 1995.
Mikhail Botvinnik was the main driving force in Soviet chess for decades
Mikhail Botvinnik was a positional player who favored closed positions with slow burning strategy. He offered the opinion himself that he was perhaps not the best tactician. Just the same his games showed he could play that way too when he needed to.
He dominated Soviet and World chess for many years. He was instrumental in the development of the World Championship providing much input into how it should be contested. His opinion on how Soviet chess should be structured in order to bring fresh talent through also held a lot of weight.
As a result his fingerprints were all over the successful chess organization in the USSR that produced the players that would dominate World chess from the 30s right through to the 90s.
Several of the former Soviet republics like Russia, Ukraine, Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan and others are still among the top chess nations today. Mikhail Botvinnik certainly played his part in that.
Botvinnik's stranglehold on chess was fairly lengthy. About 30 years. Within a year of learning how to play the game he had beaten a reigning World Champion albeit on one of many boards in a simul. Within 10 years he had joined the elite by drawing a match against a contender for the World title.
He did not use a wide variety of openings, but knew the ones he did intimately. The Queen's Gambit Declined
, the Caro-Kann Defense
, the French Defense
and the English Opening
were his trademark openings and he added to the theory of these.
It was his own success that overtook him in the end. All of the players coming in the years after him came from the Soviet system that he helped to build. Maybe he took some satisfaction from that. The first of these was Vasily Smyslov